which statement about flat characters is true?

It is somethingĮlse - 'the needs of the work as a whole,' which itself is also Portrait for a client, but it can be and often is). Is, is not accuracy (it might not be that for a painter doing a I strive to capture in my representation of it, but more a matter of how complexĭoes this character need to be? The criterion of 'need,' that Writer as a matter of how much of what is already independently out there should

That is:Ĭomplexity in characterization, in fiction, is not something that confronts the Reality, which he aims to represent, but making things up. In a moment) is that in fiction the writer is not starting from an existing One limitation (we'll have more to say on this Writers face analogous decisions, but (as we shall see) theĪnalogy goes only so far. Paint)? Should I work on a two-dimensional surface (paper or canvas) orĬonstruct something in three dimensions (casting bronze, carving stone or chiseling Monochrome (sepia ink, or pencil, or black oil on beige paper, or white-primedĬanvas), or should I do it in color (pastel pencils, or watercolor, oil-based Should I strive for complex accuracy of detail? Should I work in Shall I execute this portrait? Should I sketch it in simple terms, or The decisions a portraitist is confronted with is: in how great detail 'portraiture' in drawing and painting, or in sculpture. Often we think of 'characterization' as akin to

Critical Concepts: Flat and Round Characterization

Which statement about flat characters is true?